5 Lessons from After Virtue: How MacIntyre Reframes Virtue Ethics for Today’s Society

Photo by Leandra Rieger on Unsplash

You ever have one of those books that you pick up thinking, “Yeah, this will be a light read,” only to find yourself getting smacked across the face with a hundred years of intellectual baggage?

After Virtue by Alasdair MacIntyre is one of those books. You dive in with optimism, thinking you can skim through and understand some grand moral truth, but what you get is a straight-up philosophical bar fight.

It’s bruising, and it leaves you wondering how anyone thought we could ever agree on anything in the first place.

But don’t run off just yet. The beauty of MacIntyre’s work is that it’s not just some highfalutin, academic yawnfest. No, it’s a wake-up call.

A wake-up call about how ethics today—like that random bar fight you found yourself in—isn’t based on anything solid anymore.

People argue about virtue, justice, and morality without even understanding where those terms came from. And MacIntyre’s got the nerve to say, “Hey, stop pretending. You’re all standing on quicksand.”

If you’ve opened this book and been tempted to put it down halfway through because it’s tough to digest, trust me—you’re not alone.

But if you stick with it, you’ll see that MacIntyre offers more than a critique of modern ethics. He offers a way to fight back against the intellectual drift that has left us all stuck in a moral swamp.

So, here’s the rundown on five major lessons from After Virtue—straight up, no chaser.

1. Modern Ethics is a Fractured Joke: The Patchwork Quilt Problem

Modern ethics, MacIntyre says, is a chaos of the highest order. It’s like a drunken amateur trying to assemble a jigsaw puzzle with pieces from different boxes.

Kant, Bentham, Rawls, Nozick—they all show up with their ideas of justice, rights, and the common good, but none of them can quite seem to agree on the picture they’re supposed to be making.

None of them even bother to acknowledge that their little bits of ethical framework are built on the work of thinkers from the past.

In other words, we’re trying to play by rules that nobody even remembers writing. MacIntyre’s problem with modern ethics isn’t just that it’s fragmented—it’s that it’s pretending it’s not.

It’s like being at a dinner party where everyone’s arguing about the best wine, but nobody can agree because they’re all holding their glass the wrong way.

We’ve got all these ideas, all these theories, but none of them are grounded in anything real. They’re isolated, abstract, and detached from the context that gave them meaning in the first place.

And here’s where MacIntyre drops the hammer: if we’re going to talk about what’s right or wrong, we need to stop pretending we can do it without considering our traditions.

We can’t pretend we’re somehow detached from history. That’s what modernity has us doing—practicing a moral gymnastics routine without ever questioning why the hell we’re flipping around in the first place.

Key ConceptsTraditional EthicsModern Ethics
TeleologyPurpose-driven (e.g., Aristotle)Fragmented and abstract
RationalityHistorically contextualAbstract and individualistic
VirtueEmbedded in traditionDetached from context

2. Relativism Isn’t the Answer: Acknowledging Moral Context Doesn’t Mean Anything Goes

The modern response to the mess MacIntyre’s talking about is often, “Hey, everything is relative. Who are we to judge?”

The common refrain goes something like: “Your truth is your truth, and my truth is my truth.” It sounds cozy. It sounds inclusive. But MacIntyre’s not buying it. Not for a second.

Relativism, he says, is the lazy escape route. Sure, we can admit that moral systems are shaped by historical contexts, but that doesn’t mean we’re off the hook for choosing between them.

You can’t just throw your hands up and say, “Well, everything’s fine because it’s all relative.”

Relativism conveniently lets us off the hook of actually deciding anything, but that doesn’t mean we should toss reason and judgment out the window.

The truth is, some traditions have a better grasp on virtue and morality than others, even if none of them are perfect.

MacIntyre doesn’t want us to throw out moral discourse. He wants us to have a real fight about it. But to do that, we need to stop pretending we’re morally neutral and start looking at the deeper historical and social roots that shape how we talk about right and wrong.

It’s not about being passive and saying, “Well, you do you.” It’s about actively engaging with our traditions and asking tough questions about which ones actually help us live better lives.

3. A Return to Aristotle: Without Purpose, You’re Just Going Through the Motions

MacIntyre doesn’t just critique modern ethics; he’s got a prescription, too. His remedy? Go back to Aristotle.

Yeah, that’s right, dust off your ancient Greek philosophy because MacIntyre thinks it’s time to revisit those old-school moral ideas that have been gathering dust in the back of the bookshelf.

Aristotle’s big thing was teleology—that everything in life has a purpose.

Every action, every decision should be aimed at fulfilling some higher goal. For Aristotle, that goal was eudaimonia—flourishing, living a life of virtue, doing what’s best for yourself and society.

Modern ethics, MacIntyre argues, has ditched that idea, and we’re left with a bunch of self-help nonsense masquerading as moral guidance.

Without purpose, without a telos, what are we even doing? Just drifting.

This isn’t about bringing back ancient Greek values wholesale, but MacIntyre believes that without that sense of purpose—without a telos—modern moral philosophy is like a car without a steering wheel.

You might be moving, but where the hell are you going? The answer, according to MacIntyre, is back to the Greeks, back to Aristotle, back to ethics that actually aim at something real. Not just moral posturing.

Virtue EthicsAristotle’s InfluenceModern Ethics Without Telos
PurposeDefined by human flourishingLacks direction
VirtueAchieved through practiceAbstract and disconnected
CommunityIntegral to moral lifeOften isolated and individualistic

4. The Tragic Nature of Virtue: Sometimes, There’s No Clean Answer

Here’s the dirty secret that MacIntyre throws into the mix: virtues will conflict. Yep, you heard me. Living a virtuous life isn’t about walking a neat, straight path where everything just falls into place.

It’s about navigating a goddamn minefield of competing goods, and sometimes, no matter how hard you try, you’re going to come out looking like a loser.

Take loyalty and honesty. Both are virtuous, right? But what happens when they clash? Do you stay loyal to a friend who’s a lying bastard, or do you tell the truth and risk destroying the relationship?

MacIntyre doesn’t have an easy answer. He says that we live in a tragic world where these virtues will inevitably conflict, and the best we can do is learn how to navigate the mess with awareness. It’s not tidy. It’s tragic. But it’s real.

This isn’t a moral philosophy for people who want easy answers. It’s for people who can handle the fact that life is complicated, and that sometimes doing the right thing doesn’t make you the hero of the story.

5. The Solution? Embrace the Chaos, and Start Looking at History

So, what’s the solution to the mess that MacIntyre identifies? It’s not about finding a quick fix or a shiny new moral theory. It’s about re-engaging with the past.

It’s about going back to the thinkers who laid the groundwork for ethical reasoning and asking tough questions about why they thought the way they did.

But MacIntyre isn’t talking about some idealized past, where everything was neat and perfect. He’s asking us to deal with the historical baggage—the traditions, the practices, and the virtues that have been passed down to us.

The solution isn’t some shiny new ethical framework; it’s a deeper, more honest engagement with our own intellectual history.

Back to the Text

So, you made it through, huh? You probably expected a nice, clean moral guide but got hit with a philosophical brawl instead.

After Virtue isn’t about handing you answers—it’s about shaking you awake and making you realize modern ethics is a crazy puzzle.

MacIntyre doesn’t give you easy solutions. He just tells you to stop pretending we can fix things without understanding our history.

Ethics today is a patchwork of old ideas nobody remembers, and the only way forward is to confront that chaos head-on.

Forget neat resolutions. The point is this: stop wandering aimlessly. Start asking the tough questions and look at where we’ve come from.

Because without that, we’re just stumbling in the dark.

Comments

Leave a Reply