Unlocking Life’s Mysteries: Raymond Ruyer’s Bold Philosophy of Existence

By Daedalea – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,

A few years ago, I stumbled across the works of Raymond Ruyer.

Yeah, that’s right. I’m that guy now. The one who talks about obscure French philosophers at dinner parties when everyone else is discussing the latest Netflix series or their goddamn vacation plans.

Ruyer’s philosophy hit me like a shot of whiskey after a long day—blunt, harsh, but in some weird way, kind of illuminating.

Ruyer didn’t waste time with pretty words or abstract fluff. He dove straight into the meat of the matter.

“What is existence?” That’s the question, right? The big one. The question that haunts you when you’re lying awake at 3 a.m., wondering if anything really matters, or if we’re all just pieces of cosmic garbage floating around in the void.

Ruyer’s answer isn’t simple.

In fact, it’s messier than a bar fight, but that’s why it gets under your skin.

He wasn’t about the easy answers. He was about the questions that don’t have answers, the ones that linger in the back of your mind long after you’ve turned the page or closed the book.

The Heart of Ruyer’s Philosophy: Life, Complexity, and the Mystery of Existence

Raymond Ruyer isn’t about soft talk, no sir.

Life isn’t just some damn chemical reaction. It isn’t just bits and pieces of flesh, all grinding away, like machines.

No, for Ruyer, life had intent. Life was about autonomy, about the way organisms pulled themselves together out of chaos, fighting against the tide of entropy.

(It was like a man trying to stand up straight after a few too many drinks.)

Consciousness?

That wasn’t just some accidental byproduct of neurons firing.

No, Ruyer had more respect for it than that. Consciousness, he said, was tied up in a “mental field,” a space that bled into the brain, mixing with it but never becoming it.

The mind was a player in its own right, not just some sidekick to the body’s drama. The mind had a way of doing things that the body couldn’t even fathom.

And then there’s this idea of intentionality. Don’t think of it like some random stroll down the street. No. Life, all life, is moving towards something.

A goal, a purpose. Even when you don’t see it. Even when you’re just trying to get through the day, life is setting up shop, figuring out what comes next. That’s the thing—life’s always got one eye on the future, whether you like it or not.

He was no fan of the mechanistic view of life. You know, the one where you break everything down into gears and parts.

Life, for Ruyer, wasn’t a goddamn machine. It was something more. Something more tangled. Consciousness couldn’t be reduced to a few circuits firing off. It was an emergent thing. It came from somewhere deeper, somewhere that didn’t give two cents about mechanics.

He’d argue, “You can’t just crack a human open like a watch and expect to find a mind. It’s bigger than that.”

You could say he had a knack for mixing the hard science with the mystic. Biological systems weren’t just systems. They were like some damn philosophical riddle.

You couldn’t just poke at life from the outside and call it solved. It wasn’t that simple. It wasn’t that clean. Life was messy, dirty, and chaotic. But it worked, somehow.

And that was something Ruyer respected. Life could make a mess, but it could also put itself back together.

And that unconscious stuff?

It wasn’t just some idle part of you, waiting to be found. It was there, deep down, pulling strings you didn’t even know about.

It kept the whole show running, in the background, while you went about being human. It wasn’t just noise. It was the undercurrent.

If there’s one thing Ruyer believed, it was that we were part of something bigger.

We weren’t just animals. But we weren’t gods either. We were something else. Something stuck in between the two, trying to find a way out.

So, here’s the skinny on Ruyer’s ideas, in case you want a more digestible chunk of his brain:

Key IdeaDescription
Autonomy in LifeLife isn’t just mechanical; it’s self-organizing and self-sustaining.
Mental Field & ConsciousnessConsciousness interacts with the brain through a “mental field,” not reducible to just physical processes.
Intentionality of LifeLife is goal-directed, always anticipating future conditions.
Unconscious ProcessesThe unconscious is a vital part of life, shaping behavior and maintaining balance.
Emergence of Life & ConsciousnessBoth life and consciousness emerge from complex systems, but can’t be reduced to their components.
Critique of Mechanistic BiologyLife cannot be understood as a mere machine; it involves complex self-organization and emergent properties.
Philosophical BiologyRuyer blends biology with philosophy, treating living organisms as philosophical problems.
Subjectivity & ObjectivityThe relationship between subjective experience and objective reality is fundamental to understanding life.

Ruyer didn’t just think about life; he made you feel it.

Raymond Ruyer in Plain English: An Apprentice’s Guide to Understanding Existence

Now, let me break this down for you, like I’m talking to a kid. Life is a bit like a car, okay? But this car isn’t just some machine with parts that work together. It’s alive. It’s a moving, changing thing, and every time you take it for a ride, it changes a little bit. It’s not just a car, it’s a journey.

Imagine you’re driving this car, and every road you take changes how you feel, what you see, and where you’re going. Sometimes the roads are smooth, sometimes they’re bumpy. Sometimes it feels like you’re going nowhere, and other times, you feel like you’re on top of the world.

But the important thing is that the journey itself is the meaning. It’s not about reaching some final destination. It’s about how you live through it, how you change and grow with the ride.

The Dark Side of Ruyer’s Philosophy

Now, let’s get realer than real for a second. If you’re anything like me, you’ve stared into the abyss a few times. You’ve asked yourself the big questions: What’s the point? Why are we here?

You’ve read all the books, listened to all the philosophers, but none of it makes you feel any less empty.

Ruyer’s philosophy doesn’t promise you some kind of happy ending. In fact, it can be a bit of a punch in the gut. He’s not offering you a neat, tidy conclusion to the chaos of existence. He’s not telling you that everything will be okay in the end. That’s not his game.

What Ruyer does offer is this: the freedom to exist as you are, right here, right now.

But with that freedom comes the weight of responsibility. You have to face the unknown, the uncertainty, the terror of living in a world that doesn’t give a damn about your personal meaning.

The great existentialist Jean-Paul Sartre had a word for this—angst. The feeling that there’s no final meaning, no guiding principle, and that we’re all just floating on a sea of absurdity. It’s dark as hell.

The Scientific Angle: Is There Evidence for Ruyer’s Ideas?

Scientific explanations don’t often line up with Ruyer’s mystical philosophy. Biology, physics, and neuroscience tend to reduce life to mechanical processes. But even then, there’s something strangely Ruyeresque in the chaos theory of systems biology.

Life is seen as a complex network of interacting systems, where the whole is more than the sum of the parts. But no, science won’t give you the meaning of life.

That’s a journey you have to take yourself.

And?

So here’s the thing, folks. Life is chaos. It’s suffering. It’s uncertain. And no philosopher or mystic has all the answers. If you’re waiting for some profound truth to hit you like a lightning bolt, you’ll probably die waiting.

But, and this is where Ruyer might surprise you, there’s hope in the struggle itself. There’s meaning in how you choose to live your life.

The world may be cold and indifferent, but you’ve got the power to choose your own path.

No one else can do it for you. Your choice will decide whether you wallow in nihilism or find some way to create meaning in the absurdity.

In the end, Ruyer’s philosophy doesn’t give you a way out. It gives you a way through.

Comments

Leave a Reply