Reclaiming the Ordinary: Michel de Certeau and the Philosophy of Everyday Life in Postmodern Texts

Image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay

You wake up in the morning, but you don’t want to. Not really. The light’s too bright, the world’s too loud, and your body’s too broken to care about the demands of this miserable existence.

But you’ve got to get up anyway. You’ve got things to do. You’ve got your routines—coffee, cigarettes, the same old dismal thoughts that wrap themselves around your skull like a straitjacket.

Maybe you catch a glimpse of yourself in the mirror, and for a second, you wonder what the hell happened.

When did this all become so… ordinary? So damn predictable? The world spins on, like it always does, and all you can do is drag your ass through it.

The problem is, we’ve been sold the lie that ordinary doesn’t matter.

That it’s insignificant, that it’s beneath us. But what if I told you that’s all wrong?

Enter Michel de Certeau, a man who wasn’t afraid to look at the dirt under the fingernails of the everyday. He saw the beauty in the things we ignore.

The small acts that most people won’t even blink at. He didn’t believe the world was some grand, abstract thing you had to conquer with big ideas.

No, he was interested in the stuff you can taste in the back of your throat: the smell of bread on a cold morning, the worn-out soles of your shoes after a long day on the street, the way you shuffle through the mundane to avoid the bigger questions.

He got it. The power is in the details. It’s in the small rebellions. It’s in how you move through your day—that’s where the meaning is.

We’re all obsessed with the big picture, the grand statement.

We want to know why we exist, how we can get out of this chaotic cell.

But de Certeau? He said, “Why bother with all that heavy philosophy? Look at the now. The mundane. The everyday.” Yeah, yeah, life’s chaotic and brutal. But maybe that’s the point.

Maybe in the small, stupid things we do every day, we can find something worth living for.

And maybe, just maybe, it’s the only place left to find meaning in a world that’s busy trying to take it all away.

Image by paulo duarte from Pixabay

The Philosophy of the Everyday: A Look Under the Surface

Let’s be honest for a second.

The real problem is that most people are so goddamn caught up in the hustle, in the grind, in the illusion that meaning is somewhere out there that they never see the power in what they’re already doing.

The philosophers — all of them — had to write books about it, didn’t they?

They’re sitting in their ivory towers talking about the abstract stuff, the concepts, the universal truths.

But none of that will help you when you’re stuck in traffic on your way to a job you hate or sitting in your cramped apartment, nursing a hangover.

So here’s where de Certeau kicks in. Forget the big ideas. Let’s talk about walking to work. Let’s talk about your goddamn commute.

That’s where the game is.

De Certeau is a master at pulling the veil off the so-called “ordinary.” To him, it’s not boring, it’s not useless. No, it’s where we find meaning, where we make sense of our lives in a way no philosopher could teach us.

Forget all that grand existential nonsense. He’s not concerned with how you feel about life in some abstract sense; he’s interested in how you move through it — how you walk down the street, how you talk to people, how you live it.

And in those little moments, the seemingly insignificant ones, he says, is where we have the most power.

You’re not just a passive player in the world. You are the world. Every step you take, every choice you make—no matter how small or insignificant—shapes the world around you.

Image by Michel Rohan from Pixabay

Finding Meaning in the Junk Drawer of Life

Here’s where I’ve been stuck for years, like a man drowning in the same dark sea. Nihilism.

The idea that nothing matters, that life is just a fleeting moment of despair before we disappear into nothingness.

It’s a seductive thought. It’s easy to throw your hands up and say, “Fuck it, none of this matters.” But then I started reading de Certeau, and it gave me a new perspective.

He told me that the big ideas, the philosophical weight, might not be the answer. Maybe we’ve all been looking in the wrong place.

Instead of searching for meaning in abstract concepts, why not search for it in the small acts of everyday life?

That’s right. Nihilism is a dead-end. Sure, the world is ugly. Sure, it’s pointless sometimes. But in the small things — the way you sip your coffee, the way you walk through a crowded street, the little rituals you keep when no one’s looking — that’s where meaning hides.

We all live in the same universe, facing the same cold truth. But it’s how we respond to the everyday that makes us human.

Forget about the grand narrative of existence. It’s the small choices — those little defiant acts of life — that really count.

from pixabay.com

Explaining It Like You’re Five

Alright, kid. Let’s make this simple. Imagine you’re going to school. Same old routine, same old everything. But here’s the thing: you get to choose how you do it. You don’t have to just walk down the street like a zombie, head down, feet shuffling.

You can choose to look around, to notice the little things. The way the sun shines off the puddle, the way the wind feels on your face. That’s not just “normal.” That’s life — happening right there. And it matters. It’s what makes the whole damn thing worth it.

Life doesn’t have to be a big, dramatic moment. Sometimes it’s just the fact that you are alive, that you’re here, walking, breathing, seeing the world for what it is. That’s what de Certeau gets. He says we make life with every step we take. And that’s something even a kid can understand.

Analyzing The Meaning Of Michel de Certeau’s Awesome Quotes

I love this article seciton; you love it too.

So, let’s go again.

“The walking of passers-by offers a series of turns and detours that can be compared to “turns of phrase” or “stylistic figures.” There is a rhetoric of walking. The art of “turning” phrases finds an equivalent in an art of composing a path.”

— Michel de Certeau

Explanation:

De Certeau is saying that walking isn’t just walking—it’s poetry on the move. Every step, every dodge around a crack in the sidewalk, every sharp left turn to avoid a dog turd, is like a sentence we’re writing on the city. The streets are the paper; our feet, the pen.

He’s telling us there’s rhythm, style, and meaning in how we navigate space.

Some people stomp like they’re writing in all caps. Others shuffle, like a drunk scrawling on a napkin.

But it’s all language. Even the detours—the sudden zigzag to avoid a pigeon—those are the commas, the parentheses.

Walking, like writing, isn’t just about getting somewhere. It’s about making the journey something worth remembering. So next time you wander, realize you’re crafting your own strange, rambling poem, one step at a time.

“The created order is everywhere punched and torn open by ellipses, drifts, and leaks of meaning: it is a sieve-order.”

— Michel de Certeau

De Certeau’s saying life ain’t this clean, perfect puzzle everyone pretends it is. The world—the “created order,” as he calls it—looks neat from a distance, sure. But when you get close, it’s full of holes. Gaps where meaning just spills out or never existed to begin with. Like trying to drink from a sieve—whatever you’re chasing is always leaking through.

You think you’ve got it all figured out? Nope. There’s an ellipse. A pause. A drift into something you didn’t expect. Meaning doesn’t stay put; it’s a squatter, always shifting, refusing to pay rent.

You try to patch the holes with love, or work, but the leaks keep coming.

It’s hard, sure, but that’s what makes it real. Order is a lie people sell to sleep at night. The sieve—holes and all—is what keeps this whole damn thing alive.


“More than its utilitarian and technocratic transparency, it is the opaque ambivalence of its oddities that makes the city livable.”

— Michel de Certeau

Explanation:

De Certeau’s got a knack for peeling back the shiny fake skin off things. What he’s saying here is that a city isn’t just wires, roads, and glass towers.

It’s the weird, messy stuff—the “oddities”—that make it worth walking through. The cracks in the sidewalks. That old man shouting at pigeons.

The graffiti no one can quite decipher. Those moments where the city shrugs off its usefulness and just… is.

If everything was efficient, clean, and predictable, it’d be like living in a sterilized hospital room. Yeah, you’d survive, but would you live?

It’s the opaque ambivalence—the stuff that doesn’t fit neatly into a blueprint—that gives a city its soul. It’s the random corner café you stumble on, or the alleyway that smells like bad decisions and mystery.

That’s where life slips through the cracks. That’s what keeps the city from being a damn spreadsheet.


The only freedom supposed to be left to the masses is that of grazing on the ration of simulacra the system distributes to each individual.”

— Michel de Certeau

Explanation:

De Certeau’s not sugarcoating it here—he’s saying we’re all just a bunch of cows in a digital pasture, chewing on fake grass the system serves up. The “freedom” we think we have? It’s a bad joke. It’s scrolling through endless feeds, picking from pre-approved choices, and calling it individuality.

Simulacra—it’s the knockoff of reality, the shiny packaging without the product. Ads, TV, social media—it’s all designed to keep us fat and happy, grazing on distractions, while the real power brokers run the show.

They dish out these illusions of choice, and we lap them up because the alternative is staring down the abyss of how little control we actually have.

It’s like being told you’re free to pick any cage you want, as long as you don’t question the bars.

That’s the system—keeping us entertained, docile, and too damn full of fake freedom to notice we’re stuck.


“The sick man is taken away by the institution that takes charge not of the individual, but of his illness, an isolated object transformed or eliminated by technicians devoted to the defense of health the way others are attached to the defense of law and order or tidiness.”

— Michel de Certeau

Explanation:

De Certeau’s giving us a grim little x-ray of the machine here again.

When you’re sick, really sick, it’s not you they see—it’s your illness. The person, the flesh and blood with dreams, fears, and maybe a cat named Marbles, gets sidelined.

All the doctors, nurses, and technicians? They’re not fixing you. They’re at war with the disease. You’re just the battlefield.

It’s like you’ve been outsourced to a system that’s obsessed with control—health, law, order, tidiness. Doesn’t matter what. It’s all about keeping the chaos locked down.

You become a case file, a problem to solve, an “object to transform.” If they can’t fix you, they’ll cut it out, nuke it with chemicals, or maybe just file it under “too hard” and move on.

It’s cold. Efficient. Like janitors cleaning up messes but with white coats and scalpels instead of mops. You, the person—the sick man? You’re collateral in the grand pursuit of order. It’s not about you walking out the door feeling whole. It’s about the system making sure it can stamp “resolved” on your file.


“To walk is to lack a place. It is the indefinite process of being absent and in search of a proper. The moving about that the city mutliplies and concentrates makes the city itself an immense social experience of lacking a place — an experience that is, to be sure, broken up into countless tiny deportations (displacements and walks), compensated for by the relationships and intersections of these exoduses that intertwine and create an urban fabric, and placed under the sign of what ought to be, ultimately, the place but is only a name, the City…a universe of rented spaces haunted by a nowhere or by dreamed-of places.”


― Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life

Explanation:

De Certeau’s walking us through the city, and here’s the thing—he’s not just talking about sidewalks and crosswalks. No, he’s digging deeper, peeling back the asphalt to show you the raw, restless soul of the place.

To walk, he says, is to lack a place. That’s not just physical. It’s existential. It’s about the itch under your skin that no amount of settling down ever really scratches.

When you walk, you’re moving. Always moving. Not just physically, but emotionally, mentally, spiritually. It’s not about where you are, but where you aren’t.

The city—this sprawling beast we live in—is a tangle of rented spaces.

You don’t own it. You don’t belong to it. And it sure as hell doesn’t belong to you. So, you wander. Every step is a tiny exile, a displacement from what you think you should be or where you think you should end up.

And what’s this city, anyway? It’s not some utopia, not some perfect place where everyone finds their meaning. It’s a collection of dreams that never quite touch down. A nowhere, haunted by fantasies of somewhere. You’re walking through a mirage, chasing the idea of “the proper,” the ultimate place where everything clicks. But you know what? That place doesn’t exist. Not here. Not really.

Still, there’s something beautiful in that restlessness. All these walks, all these paths crisscrossing and colliding, they create the fabric of the city. Not the buildings, not the monuments—those are just props. It’s the people, the movement, the endless search for a place you’ll never find that makes the city alive. And maybe, just maybe, it’s in that lack, in the absence, where the real experience of living unfolds.


“An absence of meaning opens a gap in time.”

― Michel de Certeau

Explanation:

When De Certeau says, “An absence of meaning opens a gap in time,” he’s not talking about some philosophical fluff. He’s talking about how the hollow spots in life, the moments that feel empty or pointless, actually fuck with your whole sense of time.

You know those stretches where you’re just existing? No goals, no drive, no grand purpose. You’re just moving from one second to the next, like a zombie in a world of half-dreams. That’s what he’s getting at. Those moments—those dead spaces—they don’t just sit there. They tear time apart.

It’s like this: if everything had a damn point, a direction, a reason to exist, then time would flow smooth, like a stream.

But without meaning, you’re left in this gap, this space between moments, where you can’t figure out if you’re stuck in a limbo or if the world’s just forgotten you’re even here. It fucks with your head.

So, in the end, meaning isn’t just some highfalutin idea. It’s the glue that holds your sense of time together. Without it, time just splinters into nothingness. You’re left to wander in the cracks, watching the clock tick but not really living.

Opposing Views: Why Some Say the Ordinary is a Lie

Now, not everyone’s on board with de Certeau. There are those who think the ordinary is a distraction from the real business of life.

Sartre, for example, would tell you that the everyday is just a way of avoiding the truth. According to him, you don’t get meaning by doing mundane things; you get meaning by breaking free from the system, by making bold choices that challenge everything you know.

For Sartre, the grand gestures are where life’s meaning lies, not in the small, routine acts.

Then there’s the postmodern lot — Baudrillard, Foucault, the usual suspects. They’d tell you that the “ordinary” is just a mask for control, a way of keeping you distracted from the truth that nothing really matters.

The world’s a game of signs, and we’re all just playing along, pretending it means something.

Take a look at this:

PhilosopherView on the OrdinaryKey Idea
SartreThe Ordinary is AbsurdTrue meaning comes from radical action, not routine
BaudrillardThe Ordinary is SimulationLife is a series of signs with no real substance
FoucaultThe Ordinary is ControlEveryday actions are shaped by power and surveillance

These guys aren’t wrong. They just see the ordinary as a place to escape, to rebel against, to burn down. But de Certeau? He doesn’t want to burn it exactly. He wants to reclaim it. The world may be a wilderness, but it’s ours to move through, to shape, to rebel against in our own quiet way. In the ordinary, we can still find something that matters.

Winning Via Losing

Here’s the thing, and I’ve said it before: life sucks. The world’s a mess, and there are days when it seems like nothing you do matters.

Nihilism whispers in your ear that everything’s a joke, that nothing’s worth a damn. And maybe it’s right. Maybe we’re all just spinning in place, watching the world fall apart.

But de Certeau’s work — it gives me a glimmer of something different. Something darker. Something real.

The ordinary is all we have left. We’re stuck in this machine of existence, and we can either let it crush us or take a step back and say, “I’m still in charge of this.”

The everyday may not save us from the void, but maybe it’ll keep us from falling into it completely. It won’t be easy. But it’s a fight worth having.

So, yeah. The void will always have the last laugh, kinda. But you don’t have to laugh along with it. The choice is yours. And that might be the only real power you’ve got left.

Comments

Leave a Reply