Breaking Free: Emerson’s Call to Reject Conformity and Embrace Individuality

Break free from the world’s demand,
Walk your path with steady hand.
Trust the truth that lies inside,
Let your heart and soul be your guide.

The past is gone, the future near,
Live in the now, without fear.
Create your path, your voice, your flame,
Be yourself, and shape your name.

– Anonymous

The essay Self-Reliance, of the American philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson, is a timeless call to trust oneself, reject societal pressures, and embrace the boundless potential of individual creativity.

First published in 1841, this essay remains a cornerstone of American transcendentalism and a guide for personal transformation.

It encourages readers to transcend conformity and act upon their innate genius.

The Core of “Self-Reliance”

Emerson’s work identifies two forces that hinder individual greatness: conformity and consistency.

a. Conformity

Society demands that individuals blend into preordained roles which destroy creativity.

Emerson says:

“Society everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood of every one of its members.”

To rise above this, one must prioritize personal integrity over societal approval.

b. Consistency

The fear of contradicting past beliefs traps individuals in mediocrity.

Emerson says:

“Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict everything you said to-day.”

True strength lies in self-trust. To live authentically, individuals must embrace their evolving truths, unburdened by the expectations of others.

Stoicism in Emerson’s Philosophy

The parellels between Emerson and the Stoic philosophers are strong.

Stoicism teaches the pursuit of happiness through mastery of the internal self and acceptance of external circumstances. Marcus Aurelius, for instance, reflects Emerson’s call to live in the present:

“Man postpones or remembers; he does not live in the present… He cannot be happy and strong until he too lives with nature in the present, above time.”

Similarly, Epictetus insists on self-reliance and internal freedom, advocating that true power lies within oneself, untouched by external forces.

Emerson builds upon these ideas, offering practical guidance for achieving such mastery:

Where Stoicism emphasizes resilience, Emerson focuses on proactive creation, urging individuals to shape their destiny through unique contributions.

Photo by Peter Gombos on Unsplash

Emerson Compared with Other Thinkers

Here is a more extended and insightful comparison table between Ralph Waldo Emerson and other thinkers, exploring key philosophies and points of alignment or contrast:

ThinkerKey PhilosophyAlignment with Emerson
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Transcendentalist
Emphasizes individualism, self-reliance, the importance of nature, and trusting one’s inner voice. Believes in the divinity of the individual and the power of personal intuition.
Marcus Aurelius

Stoic Philosopher
Happiness comes from accepting what we cannot control, focusing on the present moment, and living in accordance with nature. Virtue and self-discipline are key to a fulfilled life.Shares Emerson’s emphasis on mindfulness, self-discipline, and living in harmony with nature, though more focused on controlling external circumstances.
Seneca

Stoic Philosopher
Advocates for the mastery of emotions, living in accordance with reason, and understanding that virtue alone is sufficient for happiness. Emphasizes the importance of time.Shares Emerson’s call for self-reliance and emotional discipline, focusing on inner peace over external circumstances.
Giacomo Leopardi

Pessimist
Life is inherently painful and meaningless; happiness is fleeting and often unattainable. Yet, one can achieve authenticity by accepting life’s bleakness.Rejects societal illusions, like Emerson, but contrasts in tone—Emerson is optimistic and focused on the power of the individual, while Leopardi emphasizes existential despair.
Emil Cioran

Existentialist
Life is absurd, filled with suffering and meaninglessness, but self-awareness and acceptance of absurdity allow one to transcend despair.Aligns on self-reliance and rejection of societal norms, but Emerson is more hopeful and focused on personal growth, while Cioran leans heavily into existential pessimism.
Friedrich Nietzsche

Existentialist, Philosopher of the Will
Emphasizes the “will to power” and the creation of one’s own values in a world devoid of inherent meaning. Advocates for the Übermensch (Overman), an individual who transcends societal norms.Emerson and Nietzsche both emphasize individualism and the rejection of conformity. Nietzsche’s focus on power and the Übermensch contrasts with Emerson’s idea of a divine self-reliant being.
Jean-Paul Sartre

Existentialist
Existence precedes essence: individuals create their own meaning in life through choices and actions. Human freedom is both empowering and burdensome.Emerson shares the existential focus on individual agency, but Sartre’s focus on freedom from societal expectations is more rooted in existential anxiety, whereas Emerson emphasizes trust in self.
Albert Camus

Absurdist Philosopher
The absurdity of life arises from the human desire for meaning in a purposeless world. One must embrace the absurd and continue living despite it.Emerson’s optimism contrasts with Camus’ more resigned approach to absurdity; both share a rejection of societal norms, but Camus focuses on existential defiance rather than transcendence.
Søren Kierkegaard

Christian Existentialist
Life’s meaning is found in the leap of faith, a personal relationship with God, and the acceptance of existential anxiety.Emerson shares the focus on individual responsibility and authenticity but does not engage with religious themes as Kierkegaard does.
Immanuel Kant

Enlightenment Philosopher
Stresses the importance of reason, autonomy, and duty. Believes that morality is based on universal laws that are grounded in reason.Emerson agrees on the importance of autonomy, but Kant’s reliance on duty and universal laws contrasts with Emerson’s emphasis on individual intuition and self-trust.
Henry David Thoreau

Transcendentalist
Advocates for simple living, connection to nature, and civil disobedience. Believes in the importance of solitude and reflection for personal growth.Thoreau and Emerson are closely aligned in their transcendental ideals. Thoreau’s ideas of nature and simplicity are deeply influenced by Emerson’s philosophy of self-reliance.
Lao Tzu

Daoist Philosopher
Advocates for “Wu Wei” or effortless action, living in harmony with the Tao (the way). One should act naturally without forcing outcomes, embracing the flow of life.Both Emerson and Lao Tzu emphasize harmony with nature and the importance of the individual’s connection to the larger world. Emerson’s focus is on the divinity of the individual.
Confucius

Confucian Philosopher
Stresses the importance of morality, social harmony, and filial piety. Believes individuals should act according to social roles while striving for virtue.Contrasts Emerson’s emphasis on personal freedom with Confucius’ focus on social order and duty. However, both value individual character and virtue.
Thomas Carlyle

Romantic Philosopher
Emphasizes the importance of great men in history and their ability to shape the world. Advocates for individual action, but with a more idealized view of historical leaders.Carlyle and Emerson both celebrate the individual’s power, but Carlyle focuses more on heroism and leadership, while Emerson emphasizes the inner divinity and universal connection.

My Favorite Emerson Quotes

The following quote hits hard and encapsulates Emerson’s vision.

Your goodness must have some edge to it,—else it is none. The doctrine of hatred must be preached as the counteraction of the doctrine of love when that pules and whines.

I shun father and mother and wife and brother, when my genius calls me. I would write on the lintels of the door-post, “Whim.” I hope it is somewhat better than whim at last, but we cannot spend the day in explanation.

This quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson highlights his bold, unapologetic view on individualism, personal authenticity, and rejecting societal pressures.

“Your goodness must have some edge to it,—else it is none.”

Emerson suggests that goodness, or virtue, should be strong and active, not passive.

To be truly good, one’s actions and beliefs must have strength and purpose.

If goodness is too mild or simply follows what others expect, it isn’t real goodness.

“The doctrine of hatred must be preached as the counteraction of the doctrine of love when that pules and whines.”

This bold statement shows that Emerson believes strong values must stand up to weaker, more sentimental versions of those values.

In a society where love is often watered down to just emotion or passivity (“pules and whines”), sometimes a stronger force—represented here as “hatred”—is needed.

This “hatred” isn’t about promoting anger or cruelty, but rejecting the weakness that can come from treating love too lightly.

Emerson’s point is that real goodness and strength require standing up for what is right, not simply going along with what’s easy or comfortable.

“I shun father and mother and wife and brother, when my genius calls me.”

Emerson is saying that when one’s inner calling or purpose (his “genius”) comes into play, it’s more important than societal roles or family ties.

“Genius” here refers to your true calling or higher potential. He’s not saying family isn’t important, but that if your personal truth requires you to go against the grain, you must do it—even if it means stepping away from family. The individual’s purpose comes first.

“I would write on the lintels of the door-post, ‘Whim.’”

This line shows Emerson’s disregard for traditional expectations. The “whim” he refers to is the spontaneous, individual drive that leads him to follow his own instincts, free from conventional rules.

By writing “Whim” on the doorpost, he’s declaring the importance of acting on one’s instincts, no matter how unpredictable or unconventional they seem.

“I hope it is somewhat better than whim at last, but we cannot spend the day in explanation.”

Emerson admits that his actions might seem impulsive or whimsical at first, but they come from a deeper, more thoughtful purpose.

He’s saying that sometimes your path won’t be easily understood or explained by others. Rather than constantly justifying your actions, trust your own vision and allow it to unfold over time.

The Solitary Genius: Nikola Tesla’s Journey of Self-Reliance

Nikola Tesla is an excellent real-world example of someone who embodied many of Emerson’s principles of individualism, self-reliance, and nonconformity.

Tesla’s life and work reflect a deep commitment to his own vision, despite widespread skepticism, rejection, and even personal sacrifice.

Just like Emerson advises, Tesla was deeply driven by his own ideas, often disregarding popular opinions and prevailing scientific norms.

He is known for his genius which gave us groundbreaking technologies, such as alternating current (AC), wireless communication, and the induction motor.

Tesla’s innovations were always ahead of his time, and he faced intense opposition from established figures like Thomas Edison and J.P. Morgan, who tried to discredit him and undermine his work.

Yet, Tesla remained a brick wall in his belief and goals. He stayed true to himself until the last minute.

Tesla also demonstrated Emerson’s principle of shunning conformity.

He didn’t seek fame or wealth for himself, unlike many of his contemporaries who sought recognition or monetary gain from their inventions.

Tesla was more concerned with pursuing what he believed was right.

He preferred solitude and focused entirely on his work, even at the cost of his personal well-being.

Tesla’s life was a constant struggle between the practical world of business and his deep, often otherworldly visions.

Photo by Rukma Pratista on Unsplash

Conclusion: The Call to Self-Reliance

Emerson’s Self-Reliance challenges us to recognize our divine potential, trust ourselves, and break free from societal chains.

In a world that often prioritizes conformity, embracing Emerson’s call is not only transformative but revolutionary.

As Emerson beautifully concludes:

“Nothing can bring you peace but yourself.

Nothing can bring you peace but the triumph of principles.”

Comments

Leave a Reply